APOCRYPHA CANDIDATE: POST TENEBRAS LUX (2012)

Light After Darkness

 366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

DIRECTED BY: Carlos Reygadas

FEATURING: Nathalia Acevedo, Adolfo Jiménez Castro, Willebaldo Torres, Rut Reygadas, Eleazar Reygadas

PLOT: A family moves to a remote area, where the father’s relationships with his wife, his children, and his neighbors steadily fracture.

WHY IT MIGHT MAKE THE APOCRYPHA: Reygadas’ deeply personal film casts aside linear narrative in favor of a series of scenes that serve as gloves-off introspection. It features startling situations and memorably surreal images driven by what feels like a rich vein of remorse and self-recrimination.

COMMENTS: The opening scenes of Post Tenebras Lux send a clear warning of trouble ahead. We open on a dreamy sequence of a little girl wandering alone through an open field. Initially, she seems delighted by her surroundings, but as she calls in vain for her parents and large animals encroach upon her, our worries for her safety increase exponentially. From here, we retreat to the relatively safe confines of a home late at night, but someone arrives to wake up a young boy: a tall goat man, glowing red, boasting a low-hung package, and carrying a toolbox. Is it a metaphorical demon, retiring for the evening before getting up to do evil once again, or the genuine article? From the look on the boy’s face, the difference scarcely matters.

That both of these terrorized young people are portrayed by director Reygadas’ own children says something about his commitment to the personal aspect of the story, as well as his possible ignorance of the consequences of being so open on the subject. The director’s method makes it impossible to know for sure which scenes are drawn from personal experience and which are merely invention, but he seems determined to explore his life with depth, so the visit by central couple Juan and Nathalia to a French sex club feels just as true as the moments spent watching the rugby team of an English prep school psyche themselves up for battle.

If Juan is Reygadas’ stand-in, then he is unexpectedly candid about the less savory elements of his character. Indictments against him include a savage beating he issues to a dog who displeases him, lame confessions that he offers in private after attending an AA meeting, and flaunting his wealth around the rural community to which he has brought his family. Post Tenebras Lux is frequently reminiscent of All That Jazz, another movie in which a tempestuous filmmaker creates a central character who magnifies all his worst characteristics. Like Joe Gideon, Juan seems regretful, especially after he is gravely injured when he interrupts a home invasion and flashes forward to a future where his wife and now-teenaged children live happy lives without him. To be fair, there’s a lot of awful going on in the small community, including the man who hires someone to chop down a large tree to spite his wife, as well as the rueful assailant who makes amends by tearing his own head clear off his body.

The most notable visual element may hold the key to Reygadas’ intentions. Throughout the film, the frame is surrounded by a blurry circle that resembles the beveled edges of a mirror. Probably a nod to this Mirror, another filmmaker’s jumbled familial reverie. Like Reygadas himself, we view Juan’s life through a dark, cracked looking glass. The result may be a negative fantasy, or possibly an apology. Whatever it is, and the filmmaker is fervently seeking out the light at the end of the tunnel.

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“…casts a strange and powerful spell… It’s as if we were sometimes in the world of David Lynch, sometimes in the world of Stanley Kubrick and a whole lot of the time in the world of Andrei Tarkovsky, with the complicated social tragedy of Mexico ladled on top.”–Andrew O’Hehir, Salon (contemporaneous)

(This movie was nominated for review by Max. Suggest a weird movie of your own here.) 

POD 366, EP. 124: GILES GETS AN UNORDERED MID-SHOW PIZZA DELIVERY THAT AFFECTS THE EPISODE IN NO WAY

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

Audio link (Spotify)

YouTube link

Discussed in this episode:

Bugonia (Oct. 2025): Save the Green Planet! remake (starring and ) has an approximate release date (October 2025) and a first trailer. We’ve been waiting for this for years, so what’s a few more months? Bugonia official site.

The Bunny Game (2012): B&W experimental shocksploitation about a prostitute named “Bunny” picked up and ritualistically tortured by a trucker named “Hog.” Just now debuting on Blu-ray. Buy The Bunny Game.

Dark City (1998): Read the Canonically Weird entry! This massive Arrow 4K UHD release contains every feature you could ever want, including both the theatrical and director’s cuts and six commentary track (two new). Check carefully to be sure you are ordering either the 4K UHD or the standard Blu-ray edition, depending on your requirements.  Buy Dark City.

Fascination (1980): Read Gregory J. Smalley’s review. The standard edition release of Jean Rollin‘s relatively mainstream horror. Buy Fascination.

Longlegs (2024): Read Giles Edwards’ review.  We note this 4K UHD steelbook version of the occultist nightmare solely due to the presence of . The release boasts extra features not on the previous Blu-ray release. Buy Longlegs.

Palindromes (2004): Read Jason Ubermolch’s reader recommendation. Surprisingly, ‘s experimental black comedy was not previously available on Blu-ray (and even the DVD was rare). This Radiance limited release includes a Blu and a UHD disc, new interviews and featurettes, a booklet, and so forth. Buy Palindromes.

Shiver of the Vampires (1971): Read the Apocryphally Weird entry! This is the standard 4K UHD version of Indicator’s previous special edition of Jean Rollin vampire classic. It includes everything in the more elaborate release, sans the 80-page booklet. Buy Shiver of the Vampires.

Sleeping Beauty (2011): Read Pamela De Graff’s review. Another movie that had been weirdly missing from the Blu-ray ranks, IFC now puts out the arthouse film wherein a radiant but dollike volunteers to be a plaything for the ultra-rich. Buy Sleeping Beauty.

Thirty Two Short Films About Glenn Gould (1993): Experimental biopic about piano prodigy Glenn Gould; maybe three or four of the short films are weird? Now out from Criterion Collection. Buy Thirty Two Short Films About Glenn Gould.

WHAT’S IN THE PIPELINE:

Next week’s Pod 366 guest will be (The FP series, Waves of Madness). Also in YouTube content, Pete Trbovich‘s will add to his “10 Weird Things” series with a collection of clips that go Beyond the Black Rainbow  (2010). In a busy week of written content, Shane Wilson posts about Post Tenebras Lux (2012),  Eugene Vasiliev gives a reading of Palms (1993), Giles Edwards plays The Bunny Game (see above), and Gregory J. Smalley performs his duty by inducting Raggedy Ann and Andy: A Musical Adventure into the Apocrypha. Onward and weirdward!

CAPSULE: KRYPTIC (2024)

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

Kryptic is currently available on VOD for purchase or rental.

DIRECTED BY: Kourtney Roy

FEATURING: Chloe Pirrie, Jeff Gladstone

PLOT: Cryptozoology fan Kay catches a glimpse of a monster in the Canadian woods, sparking an identity crisis.

Still from kryptic (2024)

COMMENTS: I think it’s no real mystery why Kryptic fails. It’s not the fault of lead Chloe Pirrie, cinematographer David Bird, or anyone on the visual effects team. The movie is competently shot and acted; it’s a professionally assembled low-to-mid-budget genre film. There is a memorable recurring scene of, shall we say, crytpid gooeyness, and a couple of cool quick-flash shots suggesting hallucinations or buried realities: a face that suddenly takes on a demonic sheen; hands whose fingers, on second glance, appear inhumanly long. All this suggests talent on hand. And the issue isn’t really that the movie is too weird, confusing, or inconclusive, although Kryptic has more than enough strangeness to frustrate the mainstream viewer. But when it works, it works, despite the ellipticality.  No, the problem clearly lies with the screenplay.

The first thirty minutes or so, which set up the premise, are perfectly fine. Kay catches the merest glimpse of a cryptid in the woods while on an (all-female) tour hosted by a Jon Lovitz impersonator; this results in near-total amnesia. While putting together the pieces of her life from clues lying around her unfamiliar car and home, she discovers a news story about a woman named Barb Valentine, a cryptozoologist who recently disappeared—and who looks exactly like Kay. It’s a promisingly mysterious beginning, even if there is nothing especially eye-catching (the second-long encounter with the creature is even less illuminating than the Patterson-Gimlin film).

The last twenty minutes or so are also not really the problem. Some will complain that the final events explain too little, but there is at least a legitimately ian flavor to the proceedings. Most importantly, while the events of the finale are still confusing, they are at least confusing in an interesting way.

No, the problem with Kryptic is clearly its long, meandering second act. Kay follows “clues” which lead her from one mildly quirky but scarcely interesting character (nearly all of them women) to another: a hotel owner, a fellow cryptid enthusiast, a magician in a bar, a trailer park family. None of these encounters make much of an impression or provide much of a clue as to where the story is eventually heading. The only meaningful developments in the entire section occur in our heroine’s head. She starts increasingly pretending to be Barb rather than Kay—or maybe she thinks she is becoming Barb? Meanwhile, she has a lot of flashbacks (or maybe flashforwards) to the aforementioned sticky fantasy involving the cryptid, usually sparked by some observation of sex. Kryptic is not up to the challenge it sets itself of illustrating that interior character arc. The encounters that make up the bulk of the movie act are inevitably dry conversations that could be fast-forwarded through without losing much of value. It seems that the script just did not have enough decent ideas for a full 90 minutes; and yet, the movie runs 102 minutes, and feels even longer. This suggests some basic advice for new directors: when padding a film, add only the minimum amount of scenes necessary to reach feature length.

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“…pure high strangeness… You can’t always be in the mood for a semen-covered, super weird, mind-melter but it’s par for the course with a kooky cryptid tale.”–Johnathan Deehan, Nightmare on Film Street (festival screening)

Celebrating the cinematically surreal, bizarre, cult, oddball, fantastique, strange, psychedelic, and the just plain WEIRD!