All posts by Gregory J. Smalley (366weirdmovies)

Gregory J. Smalley founded 366 Weird Movies in 2008 and has served as editor-in-chief since that time. He is a member of the Online Film Critics Society, and his film writing has appeared online in Pop Matters and The Spool.

CAPSULE: WICKER (2026)

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

DIRECTED BY: Alex Huston Fischer, Eleanor Wilson

FEATURING: , , , ,

PLOT: A medieval spinster Fisherwoman asks the local Basketweaver to build her a husband out of wicker.

Still from Wicker (2026)

COMMENTS: Tired of being mocked and sick of living alone, a smelly Fisherwoman (all Wicker‘s characters are referred to by their occupations) commissions the local magical Basketweaver to make her a husband. The intrigued Basketweaver accepts the challenge, tells her to be at the chapel in a month. Surprisingly, the local priest doesn’t object to officiating at this unholy wedding, and the villagers barely raise an eyebrow when the new woody construct strides into town and takes a seat at the tavern bar. In fact, the women are more intrigued than horrified by the macabre woven consort, who not only demolishes the bed with his aggressive lovemaking, but dutifully mends it afterwards. Soon, the village is consumed by envy: the women wish they had sturdier lovers, the men resent the women’s roving eyes, and the Tailor’s Wife takes it upon herself to sow doubt about the happy but unnatural union.

Wicker is minor in impact, but nearly perfect in its way. The story structure is solid and classical, providing a happy ending for the virtuous and ironic comeuppance for the wicked. Colman ably handles the unglamorous but dignified lead; Skarsgård takes a stoic approach, adopting what sounds like a Native American accent. Dinklage is delightful as the impish magical weaver, and the rest of the cast supplies ample comic relief as the hamlet of horny bumpkins. Technical aspects are all marvelous: the bucolic cinematography is fine, editing is professional, and the score provides proper period flavor. The imposing bronzed Wicker Husband himself is an amazing collaboration between the makeup and costuming departments. Sound design is also a standout; you hear every crackle of the Husband’s stiffening erection. If there’s any criticism to be made, its that the pacing occasionally lags—and some may find the Basketweaver’s habit of indulging in Shakespearean monologues distracting and pretentious, although others will see it as a mere quirky ornament.

We live in an age where humans are lured into romantic relationships with AI chatbots and full-service sexbots are mere decades away, but Wicker doesn’t reference that simmering controversy. Nor does it seriously delve into the ethical and philosophical questions about whether its automaton has free will, or whether its love is merely a simulation. Heck, it’s not even concerned whether the Fisherwoman might get splinters. Despite it’s ribaldry, Wicker is steadfastly sweet and pure in its fairy tale romanticism. Although some will find an embedded attack on the patriarchy (local wedding ceremonies involve placing a collar on the bride, which may be as kinky as it is misogynist), the film stays true to its light romcom aspirations. The satirical elements mainly focus on a simple human foible (jealousy); the same tale could have been comfortably told by Chaucer or Boccaccio. The fantastical premise is a little out there for the average moviegoer, sure, but any weirdness is only a light accent in this pleasant peasant stew.

Wicker was based on “The Wicker Husband,” an Ursula Wills short story later adapted into a stage musical. It’s heartening to see Wills stumble into a big payday for a tale that was originally published on the Internet for free.

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“…threatens to feel largely like a logline writ into something grander (i.e., a short story with a wild idea stretched into a feature), but these actors are irresistibly weird and wonderful, as only they could be.”–Ryan Lattanzino, Indiewire (festival screening)

I think this movie is weirder than average
I think this movie is better than average

CAPSULE: MARE’S NEST (2026)

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

DIRECTED BY:

FEATURING: Moon Guo Barker

PLOT: The adventures of a young girl wandering a post-apocalyptic world devoid of adults.

Still from Mare's Nest (2026)

COMMENTS: A girl of about 10 crashes a car into a tree to avoid a turtle in the road, then dictates a long lesson on evolution to the reptile. She encounters other children in a cave before making her way to a cabin, the goal of her quest, where she asks questions of a mysterious Sage (also about 10) who speaks through an Interpreter (also about 10). What follow is an absurdist interrogation where our protagonist, the delightful Moon, tries to figure out “what is happening,” while the serene Sage and intense Interpreter flatly provide answers along the lines of “the God of love and money is dead; only the planet speaks” and “fish are drowning in Great Slave Lake.” The Sage herself occasionally interjects or speaks in tongues (a running joke is that the Sage will say something like “skim milk,” and the Interpreter will helpfully add “She is saying skim milk”). The children deliver all this complex intellectual back-and-forth dialogue with a blank delivery that suggests they only half-understand what is going on—sort of like the audience at this point.

The above sequence is the most memorable part of Mare’s Nest, and it’s actually an in-film performance of Don Delillo’s one-act play “The Word for Snow.” The rest of Mare’s Nest’s episodes may, or may not, have been inspired by DeLillo. My bet is not, because Rivers, who is a painter as well as a filmmaker, seems to have little interest in language, unlike DeLillo. After “The Word for Snow” segment closes, the remaining hour of film is entirely dialogue-free (although a kid does, at one point, screech out some song lyrics while accompanying himself on a vintage Yamaha keyboard). Moon encounters other children living in a state of utopian anarchy, making their own musical instruments, enacting a play about the Minotaur (which is actually Ben Rivers’ standalone 2022 short “The Minotaur”) in the Lithica labyrinth in Menorca, and visiting a kind of museum of adults who are frozen in freakish tableaux vivants, reminiscent of the mummies of Pompeii. The cinematography, some of which is presented as if unspooling on distressed pseudo-vintage film stock, is appealing throughout, reinforcing the notion that Rivers’ primarily interest is visual communication.

It may all be some kind of meditation on the coming obsolescence of language (“what is the point of this language or that language,” says the Interpreter). Or perhaps a premonition of an upcoming social apocalypse which will force humanity to reset its way of life and begin anew. The opening and closing of Mare’s Nest imply a circular narrative structure, although I have no idea how that’s supposed to fit into the movie’s larger themes—and admittedly, I can’t confidently identify what those larger themes might be.

The film is divided into about 7 independent chapters (Moon scrawls the title of each on a chalkboard), with the only genuine link being the presence of Moon and her peers in a world without adults. The project may have worked better as a series of independent shorts than it does as a feature film. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the obsolete idiom “a mare’s nest” refers to an “illusory discovery, something of apparent importance causing excitement but which turns out to be a delusion or a hoax.” This is not the title I would choose for my own movie, but perhaps Rivers was feeling particularly puckish when he picked it.

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“English experimentalist Ben Rivers offers up another challenging, intriguing cine-poem, this time on the nature of existence and the end of the world. It is opaque but with flashes of strange brilliance…”–Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian (festival review)

I think this movie is weirder than average
I think this movie is better than average