No matter how elegant the brunch, you can’t guarantee what you’ll receive on Mothers’ Day.
POD 366, EP. 167: PAUL BUNNELL AND FRIENDS OFFER “A BLIND BARGAIN”
366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.
Discussed in this episode:
A Blind Bargain (2025): Read Pete Trbovich’s review. We talk to director Paul Bunnell and actors Jed Rowen and Claudia MacLeod about their Crispin Glover–led mad scientist flick, a reimagining of a lost Lon Chaney silent. Free tickets are available (in limited amounts per theater) from the official site.
Alice in Wonderland (1951): Read Gregory J. Smalley’s review. As they periodically do when new formats roll around, Disney upgrades their take on Lewis Carroll’s nonsense classic to 4K UHD disc (standard Blu-ray included). Buy Alice in Wonderland.
Black Rabbit, White Rabbit (2025): Multiple storylines converge in this “surreal” Tajikistan-based film about the making of a film. In theaters in Los Angeles this week, with a few additional screenings throughout the late spring and early summer and a Deaf Crocodile Blu-ray coming before the year is over. Black Rabbit, White Rabbit official site.
Buffet Infinity (2025): Read Giles Edwards’ Apocrypha Candidate review. Your chance to feast on this buffet of 90s cable weirdness arrives on VOD today. Catch it, then catch our interview with director Simon Glassman afterwards. Buy or rent Buffet Infinity.
The Devils (1971) restoration: Read the Canonically Weird entry! Multiple outlets reported this news; Ken Russell‘s medieval witchcraft-hysteria outrage The Devils has been restored in 4K, and will screen at Cannes this month and in US theaters (presumably for one night only) on October 16. Some of this is just speculation, but the official Instagram page of Warner Brothers’ Clockwork subsidiary included artwork from the infamous “rape of Christ” scenes, so I think we can safely expect this to be the full, uncut version.
Exit 8 (2025): Read Michael Diamades’ review. The Japanese liminal video-game adaptation is now available on VOD. Buy or rent Exit 8.
OBEX (2025): Read Giles Edwards’ Apocrypha Candidate review. Albert Birney‘s latest, about a nerd trying to rescue his dog from a demon in a virtual worlds, is a weird throwback to early computer adventure/role playing games. This Blu-ray includes director’s commentary, deleted scenes, and 4 Birney shorts, among other extra features. Buy OBEX.
Touch Me (2025): Ejected from their apartments, two roommates find shelter with a mysterious man whose touch is literally addictive. Now on VOD. Buy or rent Touch Me on VOD.
White Zombie (1932): Read Gregory J. Smalley’s review. The atmospheric Bela Lugosi public domain zombie classic gets a restoration, so it looks like it should. Buy White Zombie.
WHAT’S IN THE PIPELINE:
No guest scheduled on next week’s Pod 366 (but then again, our last couple of guests popped up with less than a week’s notice). I written reviews, Michael Diamades hunts down Dust Bunny (2026), Shane Wilson decides whether reader-suggest British biographical comedy The Great McGonnagall (1974) lives up to its title, Pete Trbovich returns to his “Pete’s Perverted Pix” miniseries as he rents his own Secretary (2002), and Gregory J. Smalley chews on Endless Cookie (2025). Onward and weirdward!
68*. DREAMS THAT MONEY CAN BUY (1947)
366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.
“Ernst was obviously an astute observer of what qualities go into making an experience oneiric.”—Deirdre Barrett, IASD president


DIRECTED BY: Hans Richter
FEATURING: Jack Bittner
PLOT: Fresh from the bank and owing cash, Joe needs to get some money—fast. A solution hits him for quick green, and soon he’s selling people dreams. Most come to buy (one comes to sell), but the ephemeral business ain’t all swell.

BACKGROUND:
- One loft apartment, $25,000 (partly supplied by Peggy Guggenheim), three years of filming, and the involvement of some of the contemporary art-world’s heaviest hitters is all it took to create Dreams That Money Can Buy.
- The film won of the Venice Film Festival’s special award for “Best Original Contribution to the Progress of Cinematography”.
- At its New York City premiere, Dreams was projected on wall and ceiling of the venue, instead of the screen.
- Stanley Kubrick, aged 19 at the time, shows up as an extra, securing his place amongst the cool kids of cinema five years before his directorial debut.
INDELIBLE IMAGE: In a feature-length showcase from the avant-garde’s best, choosing just one is an odd request. G. Smalley suggests the scene from Max Ernst’s “Desire” where an elderly butler (Ernst himself) pulls first a shirtless man, then a pallid, corpselike woman in a nightgown out from under the sleeper’s red-velvet curtained canopy bed. It helps that the room is filled with smoke (possibly from an incinerated telephone) and that the sound accompaniment is a trancelike looped recording of men and women chanting backwards.
TWO WEIRD THINGS: Bouncy beatnik narrator; escaping out the window with Zeus-bust luggage into death color-drop explosion
WHAT MAKES IT WEIRD: This dream anthology has pep, humor, surrealism, and cool to spare, all presented in the confines of a brownstone apartment.
Promo trailer for a London screening of Dreams that Money Can Buy (1947)
COMMENTS: It is the intersection of Capitalism and Surrealism. It is Continue reading 68*. DREAMS THAT MONEY CAN BUY (1947)
APOCRYPHA CANDIDATE: HAIR HIGH (2004)
366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

DIRECTED BY: Bill Plympton
FEATURING: Voices of Eric Gilliland, Sarah Silverman, Dermot Mulroney
PLOT: A middle-aged bartender recounts a tragic tale of doomed love to a young couple.

WHY IT MIGHT JOIN THE APOCRYPHA: Plympton’s trademark animation style, verging on surrealism, meets a personal take on familiar rom-com and high school drama tropes.
COMMENTS: Bill Plympton is a major name in American adult animation today, especially for those preferring the offbeat and the bizarre. His raw and expressive style, full of crude jokes and grotesque yet hilarious visual gags, balances gross-out humor with a lighthearted and wholesome tone. Nowhere is that blend more apparent than in High Hair, a unique take on high school rom-coms with a Burtonesque twist.
A barman recounts the tale of Cherry and Stud and their unexpected, passionate love affair to two young students. We trace the teen drama tropes from the beginning: Cherry is the popular girl, and Stud is a nerdy, friendless loser. Cherry already has a boyfriend, the muscular Rod, another reason Stud shouldn’t have a chance with her in real life. However, when Rod “punishes” Stud by forcing him to become Cherry’s slave, something sweet and slightly kinky blossoms between them.
A love affair starting as a power game or a conflict is another well-worn trope of romantic comedies. But Plympton’s approach offers something different than what you’d might expect. The first half of the movie is full of crude, if admittedly inventive, jokes. Disturbing imagery is played for laughs, with even a hint of animated body horror. Gradually, a sweet love affair blooms, one that, surprisingly, doesn’t feel uneven or forced at all. The second half of the film follows Cherry and Stud falling in love, until a final twist combines the dark and macabre with an unexpected, yet not unwelcome, dose of tenderness.
Among the visual gags of special note—and there are many—are jokes about the characters’ hairstyles. As the title hints, hair is a rich symbol in this movie. Follicles can express femininity or masculinity, and even take the form of a phallic symbol. Here, hair indicates hierarchy and social status.
All in all, this is a whimsical film, a perfect date movie for weirdos. Those who aren’t turned off by some bad-taste humor will be rewarded with a touching narrative. Behind the weirdness and grotesquerie beats a heart.
Hair High [Blu-ray]
- Acclaimed animator Bill Plympton’s (THE TUNE, MUTANT ALIENS) cheerfully unhinged tribute to 1950s teen romance and musicals like GREASE and HAIRSPRAY
New starting from: 23.21 $
Go to AmazonIT CAME FROM THE READER-SUGGESTED QUEUE: MARUTIRTHA HINGLAJ (1959)
AKA Hinglaj, The Desert Shrine
366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.
DIRECTED BY: Bikash Roy
FEATURING: Uttam Kumar, Sabitri Chatterjee, Anil Chatterjee, Pahari Sanyal, Bikash Roy
PLOT: A young man and woman are rescued in the desert by a group of pilgrims of various castes and faiths.

COMMENTS: Movies about religion run similar dangers to those from any long-running franchise. Built as they are around a deep canon embraced by a particularly ardent regiment of hardcore fans, the producers must satisfy the expectations of devotees while extending an outreach to any potential converts. It’s hard to be all things to all people, especially when you’re relying on the moral rectitude of the universe.
Marutirtha Hinglaj, however, is not concerned with appealing to the unenlightened, and that’s honestly to the film’s benefit, because we heathens can appreciate the pilgrims’ passion and determination at face value. An understanding of the apparent tolerance between the Hindus and Muslims on the dangerous trek, familiarity with the unique powers of redemption granted by the goddess Durga, and even the finer points of why highborn girls aren’t supposed to run away with street-rat boys are all concerns you can set aside with this movie. Hinglaj is perfectly legible as a study of the human quest for forgiveness and emotional peace, no matter how much turmoil is required to achieve it. Christian travelers to Lourdes or even rock fans making the trip to Jim Morrison’s grave can relate.
The film was based on a popular travelogue of the time, and if we were just following this group as they made their way through the desert, it would be a fairly straightforward accounting of the journey. Director Roy’s major contribution to the narrative is the introduction of the forlorn couple whom the marchers rescue from the wastelands. Thirumal is a poor fortune teller tasked with predicting the future for well-off bride-to-be Kunti. They fall madly in love (the initial transgression) and then elope (compounding the problem), which is when tragedy finds them. Roving bandits attack the couple, robbing them and assaulting Kunti, a crime that they view as punishment for their earlier wrongdoing (a frustrating instance of culturally approved victim-blaming that is probably the most inexplicable belief for a 21st-century audience). It’s a lamentable fate, not least because Roy crafts a charming montage of the illicit pair’s moneymaking ventures on the road, demonstrating their overwhelming charm as he plays music while she dances. Thirumal beams with rapturous love for his wife, but we also start to see his palpable jealousy at onlookers’ attention, which foreshadows the madness that will soon overtake him as he pivots between passion and faith.
It is difficult but essential to understand the moral code on display here. The conditions for the march across the Indian wasteland are maddeningly difficult, but of course the challenge is what ennobles the effort. They have been promised complete forgiveness for their mistakes—some of which are revealed to be quite severe—but the future looks to be as bright as the present is dark. Even Kunti, who believes herself to be unpure as a result of both her actions and the cruelties forced upon her, comes to hope for the deliverance that reaching Hinglaj will bring. By contrast, Thirumal’s mania isn’t because he doesn’t believe in the possibility of healing, but because he’s certain that he doesn’t deserve it. His struggle is balanced by the kindness and sympathy of the traveling company. The weight of this conflict lifts Marutirtha Hinglaj out of the real world and into an elevated plane of moral debate. It’s a little strange to watch these intensely earnest travelers, and when shot against Roy’s dramatic backdrops, which deftly combine imperiously vast locations in the Makran desert with unusually authentic soundstage filming, the whole proceeding takes on a surreal quality.
Marutirtha Hinglaj isn’t out to convert anyone. It’s perfectly acceptable to look at the whole enterprise as proof of the madness of religious belief. Yet there is a beauty in the purity of these travelers’ moral code, and a dramatic correctness in the way that the story metes out an appropriate justice. The film makes a weird gamble on the drama of the mystery of faith, and seems to have earned a nod of approval from the gods.
WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:
(This movie was nominated for review by Debasish, who called it “a very existential movie with spiritual and surreal undertones.” Suggest a weird movie of your own here.)