APOCRYPHA CANDIDATE: CITY OF PIRATES (1983)

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

Weirdest!

DIRECTED BY:

FEATURING: Anne Alvaro, Melvil Poupaud,

PLOT: Young Isidore lives a sheltered life in the Overseas French Territories During the Second World War, until an orphan boy lures her into crime and an escape to a mythic island.

Still from City of Pirates (1983)

WHY IT MIGHT JOIN THE APOCRYPHA: Absurdities follow fast upon one another in Ruiz’s hazy, dreamy narrative.

COMMENTS: Raúl Ruiz is one of the most prominent surrealist film directors of the latter half of the twentieth century. An exile from Pinochet’s Chile, Ruiz produced most of his movies in France;  the 1970s and 1980s were his most formally radical years.

As with Three Crowns of the Sailor (1982), maritime adventures inspire City of Pirates‘ narrative. Any similarities with the early work are superficial, however; the focus here lies elsewhere. The plot revolves around a young woman named Isidore, who lives a middle-class, sheltered life with her family in the Overseas French Territories during World War Two. From the beginning, the violence of real historical events is tangibly nodded to through newspaper headlines. Our heroine’s mother states, “When we [humanity] get used to something, we start to crave something else,” suggesting a tale about humans’ propensity for war and destruction. The narrative moves forward through the appearance of an orphan boy, who lures Isidore into a series of absurd crimes as they make their way to a mythic island. There, a new series of allegorical misadventures ensues.

Political undertones become loud and clear through the absurdity of the events, which verge on the grotesque. Even without graphic imagery, the underlying violence haunts the viewers, while dominating and guiding our protagonists. At times, the war seems an abstraction, something happening in a parallel reality, like an imaginary naval skirmish in a garden of flowers. Yet, you can feel the seed of violence it plants under the skin.

The cinematography enhances this sentiment through blurry visual effects and over-stylized, almost expressionistic high-contrast lighting. Pastel tones, recalling fairy tales or old postcards, merge with a darker color palette and with sepia tones. But the most iconic visual element is the sporadic use of uncommon POVs foregrounding small details while marginalizing the main action, creating a sense of disorientation. In one of the most emblematic shots, Ruiz even put the camera inside an actor’s mouth.

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“…surreal fantasy is the form of the allusive pic. It thereby defies rational explanation. The pic asks the viewer to take a leap of faith into Ruiz’s strange humor and absurd storytelling… a pic of inspired madness… not meant for everyone.”–Dennis Schwartz, Dennis Schwartz Movie Reviews

I think this movie is weirder than average
I think this movie is better than average

POD 366, EP. 193: WHEN THE SUN STANDS STILL FOR JAMES NEWTON

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

Audio link (Spotify)

YouTube link

Discussed in this episode:

When the Sun Stands Still (2024): When Kenneth’s step-daughter disappears in the woods, detectives and a paranormal investigator try to decode increasingly mysterious events.

(trailer age restricted for brief near-nudity)

Harold and Maude (1971): Read the reader recommendation. A suicidal teen finds meaning in the arms of an elderly holocaust survivor. Buy Harold and Maude.

WHAT’S IN THE PIPELINE:

We have no guest scheduled for next week’s Pod 366, but Greg and Giles will return with Pete to discuss the week’s weird news and releases (if any). In written content, Michael Diamades sails off to ‘ City of Pirates (1983), Shane Wilson plans to Kill the Jockey (2024) (again), and Gregory J. Smalley is will hang with The Weird Kidz (2022). Onward and weirdward!

CAPSULE: WICKER (2026)

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

DIRECTED BY: Alex Huston Fischer, Eleanor Wilson

FEATURING: , , , ,

PLOT: A medieval spinster Fisherwoman asks the local Basketweaver to build her a husband out of wicker.

Still from Wicker (2026)

COMMENTS: Tired of being mocked and sick of living alone, a smelly Fisherwoman (all Wicker‘s characters are referred to by their occupations) commissions the local magical Basketweaver to make her a husband. The intrigued Basketweaver accepts the challenge, tells her to be at the chapel in a month. Surprisingly, the local priest doesn’t object to officiating at this unholy wedding, and the villagers barely raise an eyebrow when the new woody construct strides into town and takes a seat at the tavern bar. In fact, the women are more intrigued than horrified by the macabre woven consort, who not only demolishes the bed with his aggressive lovemaking, but dutifully mends it afterwards. Soon, the village is consumed by envy: the women wish they had sturdier lovers, the men resent the women’s roving eyes, and the Tailor’s Wife takes it upon herself to sow doubt about the happy but unnatural union.

Wicker is minor in impact, but nearly perfect in its way. The story structure is solid and classical, providing a happy ending for the virtuous and ironic comeuppance for the wicked. Colman ably handles the unglamorous but dignified lead; Skarsgård takes a stoic approach, adopting what sounds like a Native American accent. Dinklage is delightful as the impish magical weaver, and the rest of the cast supplies ample comic relief as the hamlet of horny bumpkins. Technical aspects are all marvelous: the bucolic cinematography is fine, editing is professional, and the score provides proper period flavor. The imposing bronzed Wicker Husband himself is an amazing collaboration between the makeup and costuming departments. Sound design is also a standout; you hear every crackle of the Husband’s stiffening erection. If there’s any criticism to be made, its that the pacing occasionally lags—and some may find the Basketweaver’s habit of indulging in Shakespearean monologues distracting and pretentious, although others will see it as a mere quirky ornament.

We live in an age where humans are lured into romantic relationships with AI chatbots and full-service sexbots are mere decades away, but Wicker doesn’t reference that simmering controversy. Nor does it seriously delve into the ethical and philosophical questions about whether its automaton has free will, or whether its love is merely a simulation. Heck, it’s not even concerned whether the Fisherwoman might get splinters. Despite it’s ribaldry, Wicker is steadfastly sweet and pure in its fairy tale romanticism. Although some will find an embedded attack on the patriarchy (local wedding ceremonies involve placing a collar on the bride, which may be as kinky as it is misogynist), the film stays true to its light romcom aspirations. The satirical elements mainly focus on a simple human foible (jealousy); the same tale could have been comfortably told by Chaucer or Boccaccio. The fantastical premise is a little out there for the average moviegoer, sure, but any weirdness is only a light accent in this pleasant peasant stew.

Wicker was based on “The Wicker Husband,” an Ursula Wills short story later adapted into a stage musical. It’s heartening to see Wills stumble into a big payday for a tale that was originally published on the Internet for free.

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“…threatens to feel largely like a logline writ into something grander (i.e., a short story with a wild idea stretched into a feature), but these actors are irresistibly weird and wonderful, as only they could be.”–Ryan Lattanzino, Indiewire (festival screening)

I think this movie is weirder than average
I think this movie is better than average

IT CAME FROM THE READER-SUGGESTED QUEUE: THE FLOOD (1985)

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

“The Flood” has been posted by the director on Vimeo, where it is available to watch for free.

DIRECTED BY: Jaap Drupsteen

FEATURING: Pauline Daniels, Julian Beusker, Sylvia Millecam, Rudi Van Vlaanderen, and the voices of Laurence Harvey, Sebastian Cabot,

PLOT: Adam and Eve betray God by eating the forbidden fruit of knowledge, learning shame and being cast out of Eden; later, Noah builds an ark for his family as well as the animals of the Earth to survive the coming deluge.

Still from The Flood (1985)

COMMENTS: In relatively recent memory, opera was not only broadcast on American television, but was commissioned specifically to be shared with the masses. The most famous example is probably ’s 1951 holiday offering for NBC, Amahl and the Night Visitors, but other notable composers of note have been enlisted to tackle the medium, including Benjamin Britten, Norman Dello Joio, and Duke Ellington. Igor Stravinsky, the musical mind behind “The Rite of Spring,” a work so avant-garde it nearly sparked riots, is possibly the greatest composer to be tasked with bringing opera to TV. The commission for the opera we attend today came at a time when Stravinsky was looking forward and backward simultaneously: he was adopting 12-tone serial techniques in his composition while pursuing spiritual and scriptural themes in his subject matter. The piece he crafted for CBS Television’s Breck Golden Showcase was right in the sweet spot, a blend of opera, ballet (choreographed by George Balanchine), and spoken word narration and dialogue that tells two of the most familiar tales from the book of Genesis. In these days of traitors and real housewives, we should probably not expect this mindset to return anytime soon.

“The Flood” has not endured as one of the landmarks in Stravinsky’s catalogue, which makes it interesting that Dutch video artist Jaap Drupsteen excavated it some two decades later. One account suggests that he was inspired by the rising waters threatening his homeland (an interesting parallel to Stravinsky himself, who said that the idea for the piece came to him on a visit to Venice), but there’s not really an environmental or political message in his production of “The Flood.” This is a fairly straightforward retelling of the two parables, re-envisioned using the video tools then seen throughout the day on MTV. In fact, “The Flood” evokes the video art of Zbigniew Rybczynski, whose work was in regular rotation on the channel, and who further developed his vision in films such as “Imagine” and  “Orchestra” piling layer upon layer of green-screened action like a funhouse mirror that stretches into infinity with only the slightest variation. The sound is Stravinsky; the look is The Art of Noise.

In some respects, “The Flood” is a bit of a stunt, repurposing old audio with new imagery like an episode of “Drunk History.” The modern cast lip-syncs to the original 1962 recording of the opera, particularly the spoken word segments, which means, for example, that the older gentleman in the neat black suit is mouthing the voice of Mr. French from “Family Affair.” The visuals, however, are so 1980s as to thoroughly redefine the work. Adam and Eve appear on a Tron-like grid, as though they had been generated in a computer, and their knowledge compels them to cover their nakedness with shiny party frocks that would have been at home at a happening nightclub (presaging their ultimate walk of shame). The city to be wiped out in the coming cataclysm is a Dali-esque keepsake box that vanishes into the horizon. Lucifer is an androgynous Ziggy Stardust-type figure who slinks around in spangled bodysuits and barely-there dance belts. Most notably, God spins overhead as a trio of baritones inside the finest spinning triangle a video toaster could generate.

There’s irony in the realization that the showiness and the high-tech-for-its-time trappings make “The Flood” more like its source material, the York and Chester miracle plays. These staged scriptures brought the tales of the Bible to the illiterate medieval masses, dramatizing the most compelling tales with pageantry and potency. So too does Drupsteen’s take on Stravinsky’s take on Genesis. What was prestige becomes fancifully odd, and the passage of time has made it even more charmingly peculiar. With this kind of approach, maybe opera could find its way to the small screen once more.

(This movie was nominated for review by Tyler. Suggest a weird movie of your own here.) 

I think this movie is weirder than average
I think this movie is better than average

Celebrating the cinematically surreal, bizarre, cult, oddball, fantastique, strange, psychedelic, and the just plain WEIRD!