IT CAME FROM THE READER-SUGGESTED QUEUE: FIEND (1980)

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

DIRECTED BY: Don Dohler

FEATURING: Don Leifert, Richard Nelson, Elaine White, George Stover, Greg Dohler

PLOT: A “fiend”—an evil spirit that takes possession of a corpse and absorbs the life energy of humans-–moves into the quiet suburb of Kingsville, where a concerned neighbor immediately suspects a connection between the new resident and an unsolved killing spree.

COMMENTS: God bless the Don Dohlers of the world. They don’t have a lot of resources, they don’t have a lot of talent, but by gum they love movies, they’ve got determination, can-do spirit, and just enough cash and friends and family to put together a chiller. You don’t go to a Don Dohler movie with the hope that it will be very good, but it’s a whole lot of fun having him in there giving it the ol’ college try.

Shot afterhis debut feature The Alien Factor, Fiend finds Dohler a more experienced filmmaker, but also working with an even thinner budget of a mere $6,000 to continue his bid to become the of Maryland. So he develops a story around an original monster–the title character, a kind of free-floating, body-possessing demonic entity–to sit alongside vampires, zombies, and werewolves. We get an impressively economical introduction to our star villain: after a shapeless red cloud plunges into the grave of a recently deceased man, the reanimated body rises and, within the course of the next 6 minutes, strangles a conveniently located woman in the cemetery, moves into a split-level ranch in the Baltimore suburbs (what was the house closing like?), and chokes another woman while she walks the five miles through the woods from her carpool stop to her home. 

This kind of efficiency is typical of Fiend, which does not waste a lot of time with details. In the space of a few months, the monster takes on the name Longfellow, acquires a cat and a lucrative career teaching music, hires an accountant-cum-Renfield to manage his extensive operations, and builds a combination music studio/shrine to Satan in his basement where he keeps an ample supply of professional headshots of his prospective victims. So it’s only fair that the only force powerful enough to stop him will be equally lucky. Gary is a persnickety neighbor who has it in for Longfellow from the start (supposedly because of the noise, but more likely because the newcomer has an even more impressive mustache). But he should play the ponies, because he immediately pegs Longfellow as the local serial strangler through intuition alone, with not a scrap of evidence to back him up—much to the frustration of his unduly patient wife. Fortunately, a visit to Longellow’s subterranean lair provides all the proof he needs, and the battle of wits commences.

The usual hallmarks of bad-moviedom are here. The acting is wooden and mannered, the score-by-Casio is repetitive and intrusive, and the script is driven by incredible coincidence. (Does the cemetery groundskeeper carry copies of the obituary for every corpse in the place?) But you can tell that Dohler is a deeply earnest storyteller. Compelled to shoot his scenes of mayhem in broad daylight, he makes the killer’s audacity add to the overall sense of unease. Recognizing the convention of secondary horror characters whose ignorance does them in, Dohler crafts a pretty decent action scene in which a bystander attempts to come to the aid of a potential victim, complicating the villain’s plans. Most intriguingly, he hands the hero’s mantle to the abrasive Gary. It’s almost charming to watch Gary barrel around, insisting that something suspicious is going on and bitterly rejecting his wife’s insistence that he lighten up. It puts an intriguing twist on the fact that he’s right about everything. 

On a side note, here’s a mystery for you: where the hell are Gary and Marsha’s kids? There’s no shortage of children in the film, including Dohler’s own son; one of those youngsters even ends up at the wrong end of Longfellow’s glowing hands. We’re certainly supposed to believe the Kenders have kids, because they talk a lot about their filmmaking project for Scouts (an opportunity for Dohler to drop the name and the address of his real-life bookshop),; but we never see them, not once. Is this a scenario borrowed from Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? It’s truly bizarre.

Fiend is not a good movie. Crucially, it’s not a scary or suspenseful movie. But it benefits strongly from a second viewing, when you can set aside all the film’s ineptitude and appreciate the purity of the effort. Viewed in the right circumstances, it’s a goofy piece of fun, and the world of cinema can always use a goofy piece of fun. That’s a legacy to remember Don Dohler by, long after both he and the Fantasy Kingdom Bookstore at 704 Market Street have left the mortal plane.

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“Even the amateur quality of the performances contribute to the film’s overall dream-like feel…  I mean, don’t get me wrong. This is definitely an amateur film, full of clunky dialogue and the occasional slow scene. But so what? Even those flaws add to the film’s nicely surreal atmosphere.” – Lisa Marie Bowman, Through the Shattered Lens

(This movie was nominated for review by Joe. Suggest a weird movie of your own here.)

THE WEIRD MOVIES GUIDE VOL. 2 IS HERE AND WE’RE GIVING A SET OF BOTH VOLUMES AWAY

It’s here! Well, it’s been here for a while, but our “soft launch” was truly soft. Now we’re ready to officially announce this (these) bad boy (boys), and give one set away.

Covering everything from art-house surrealism to next-generation cult movies to B-movie atrocities and unclassifiable oddities, 366 Weird Movies has been publishing online since 2009. Here are our canonical choices of the 366 weirdest movies worthy of your eyeballs – and the day you should watch them on – in all-new capsule reviews, delivered with our usual combination of sly humor and serious insight.

You can buy the books at Amazon (faster) or BearManorMedia.com (longer for delivery, but we get a bigger cut).

Contest rules:

  • There are 3 ways to enter. Either comment on this post that you’d like to be included, or share the announcement on Twitter X and/or BlueSky with the tag #Contest366. Do all three, and you’ll earn three entries.
  • Winner will be selected randomly, raffle-style, from all eligible entries. Winner will get a copy of the softcover versions of “366 Weird Movies Guide Vol. 1” and “366 Weird Movies Guide Vol. 2.”
  • Winner must supply a mailing address in the US. Winners will have 24 hours after notification to provide an address. If they do not do so, or the winning entry is ineligible, we will pick another winner.
  • 366 Weird Movies employees and employees of the nonexistent subsidiaries of 366 Weird Movies are ineligible for this contest.
  • Contest closes at midnight on Aug. 17, 2025.

Also, anyone who sends their name and U.S. address to info@366weirdmovies.com will receive a hand-numbered, handwritten postcard (like the image above) with a random quote from a weird movie. NAMES AND ADDRESSES WILL BE DELETED AFTER MAILING AND YOU WILL NOT BE ADDED TO A MAILING LIST.

POD 366, EP. 130: EBONY & IVORY GO TO HARVEST FRIENDSHIP WITH THE DEVIL

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

Audio link (Spotify)

YouTube link

Discussed in this episode:

Boys Go to Jupiter (2024): Animated coming-of-age story about a 16-year-old food delivery cyclist. The trailer and promo material proudly highlights quotes like “otherworldly,” “surreal,” and “bizarre,” so you know they’re aiming for our type of viewer. Boys Go to Jupiter official homepage.

Ebony & Ivory (2024): In 1981, two pop superstars hole up in a Scottish cottage to write a musical masterpiece. The Greasy Strangler‘s director and star team up almost a decade later on another absurd, anti-comic obscenity. Ebony & Ivory official site.

Friendship (2024): Read Gregory J. Smalley’s review. ‘s higher-profile, less-obscene (compared to Ebony & Ivory, above) anti-comedy is now available on Blu-ray with deleted and extended scenes and other goodies. (Also, the VOD version has now dropped to a more affordable price point.)  Buy Friendship.

Harvest (2024): directs in a meditation about the birth of modern capitalism as a Scottish town is mapped and parceled out. This slow-paced (and Marxist?) arthouse weirdness is not to be confused with horror film Strange Harvest, also in theaters this week. Harvest at MUBI.

Late Night with the Devil (2023): Read Giles Edwards’ Apocrypha Candidate review. The popular exorcist found-footage feature arrives in the ultimate physical media format: the 4K steelbook. We may now lay our coverage to rest. Buy Late Night with the Devil.

WHAT’S IN THE PIPELINE:

No guest scheduled on next week’s Pod 366, and Giles Edwards will take the week off, but Greg and Penguin Pete Trbovich will be there to give you the latest on the week’s weird news and releases. In written content,  Shane Wilson reviews Fiend (1980), a microbudget creature-feature from (“a bid to become the of Maryland”); while Gregory J. Smalley plans to report on whether Ebony & Ivory (see above) provides perfect harmony. Onward and weirdward!

CAPSULE: THE HUNGRY SNAKE WOMAN (1986)

Petualangan Cinta Nyi Blorong

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

DIRECTED BY: Sisworo Gautama Putra

FEATURING: Suzzanna, Advent Bangun, George Rudy, Nina Anwar

PLOT: A criminal seeks out the Snake Goddess (also called the Snake Queen), who promises him wealth if he kills three women, drinks their blood, and eats their breasts, but instead, at the instigation of a rival Snake Woman, he betrays the Snake Goddess by sticking a pin into her neck while making love, changing her back into a snake.

Still from The Hungry Snake Woman (1986)

COMMENTS: Mythology is weird, but mythology seen through the eyes of exploitation film directors is even weirder. Hungry Snake Woman feels at least loosely connected to feverish legends from the Indonesian jungles, but it adds a lot of sex, blood, and kung fu. It cares not a whit for logic, dropping plotlines as if they were squirming scorpions and rushing off to the next diversion.

This is the kind of movie were it’s tempting to give a simple recap of the plot, but it’s probably better to let the viewer discover the madness for themselves. Still, running through a few of the highlights should be enough to pique your interest. We can’t pass up the major spoiler, because it’s too tempting: the Snake Goddess literally turns the film’s antagonist into Dracula at one point—not into a generic vampire, but the public domain Count himself, complete with black cloak, plastic fangs, and cheesy bat-transformation. The only alteration from the traditional template is that he now dines on the breasts of maidens after drinking their blood. It’s also worth noting that, indicative of the script’s short-attention span, our intrepid antihero quickly abandons his bloodsucking role after getting rudely stomped on the foot by a potential victim. Also keep an eye out for a menacing stock footage giraffe, incongruous day-for-night shooting, sex with a snake, centipede vomiting, and an Indonesian mullet. And kung fu. And a chainsaw. It’s that kind of movie. Hungry Snake Woman has everything a film fanatic could ask for, except for purpose or meaning. As one of the characters says midway through, “If you ask me, this doesn’t make much sense.”

Despite its indifference to logic, its mediocre acting, and its general cheapness, Hungry Snake Woman has some genuine visual appeal. The special effects are chintzy—usually just editing to make things disappear and reappear—but the costuming, makeup, set design, and lighting are superior, verging on sumptuous at times. The Snake Queen/Goddess glitters in her bejeweled regalia; her harem girls tantalize in their sheer chiffon tops and colorful bikini bottoms; and the Snake Woman looks dramatic painted head-to-toe in mottled green. The Snake Goddess’ entrance, levitating in front of her cave wall like a sexy Buddha, is imposing. These points of visual interest suggest divine grandeur, when things on the ground otherwise get totally absurd.

Suzzanna (who plays a double role here) was a huge horror star in Indonesia and is credited onscreen before the title appears; she was 46 when this was released, but still looks glamorous (and even has a nude scene, though shot at distance). The Hungry Snake Woman is actually a sequel to 1982’s The Snake Queen, which is essentially lost (although you might be able to track down a low quality VHS copy). I suspect you won’t miss anything by not having seen the first one. The Mondo Macabro Snake Woman Blu-ray is restored in 2K and looks fantastic, with vibrant colors and no visible damage. The voices on the English dub sound familiar from Hong Kong movies of the period; subtitles are also available, but this is the type of schlock that actually benefits from a dub job. And a six-pack.

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“…a 1986 Indonesian stunner that fits right in with some of [Mondo Macabro’s] essential weird world staples like Mystics in Bali and Alucarda… it involves plenty of macabre and grotesque imagery (including a bit of animal mistreatment, mainly some scorpions), but it flirts with fantasy and comedy as well when it isn’t just utterly unclassifiable surrealism.”–Nathaniel Thompson, Mondo Digital (Blu-ray)

The Hungry Snake Woman [Blu-ray]
  • The world Blu-ray premier of a wild Asian horror movie!

Celebrating the cinematically surreal, bizarre, cult, oddball, fantastique, strange, psychedelic, and the just plain WEIRD!