Category Archives: Miscellanea

CAPSULE: TOMMY (2017)

366 Weird Movies may earn commissions from purchases made through product links.

Beware

DIRECTED BY: Jordan Stowe-Merritt

FEATURING: Emma Hallinan, Marcel Jortzik

PLOT: A parent mourns the loss of her pinball-playing son—but has the kid returned as a ghost?

Still from Tommy (2017)

WHY IT WON’T JOIN THE APOCRYPHA: We had retired this section explaining why individual movies wouldn’t make the List after we completed the first 366 entries, but Tommy stirs us to revive it. What in the world are our readers thinking in constantly promoting this pedestrian British hokum for inclusion on our sacred List? Are you all a bunch of idiots who just don’t get the mission of this site? Our own correspondent even stated that Tommy was “like something out of a bad acid flashback” with a “non-stop assault of insane imagery” resulting in a film that was “bizarre to the point of self-parody.” I’d like to know what the hell movie he was watching! These complaints are not to impugn the movie itself, which is well-enough-acted and shot (if way too short for a feature presentation)—but it’s nowhere close to one of the weirdest films of all time.

COMMENTS: In 1969, the cacophonous British rock and roll band the Who dropped a double-album-length “rock opera” about a messianic deaf, dumb and blind kid who could miraculously play pinball. In 2017, a team of fellow Brits dumped this faithless adaptation in which (spoiler alert) you never even see the title character. That’s right, apparently this revisionist version of Tommy takes place after the deaf, dumb and blind kid has turned into a dead, dumb and blind kid. And there is no pinball in the film whatsoever! It comes from a no-name director and is performed by a (capable) cast of unknowns, but with no cameos from the Who or “rock ‘n’ roll” celebrities (which would have been a great idea.)

Instead, this time the story focuses on a couple who are grieving the death of the woman’s son in a new house that may be haunted. It’s a cut-rate affair,  with just two main actors, two main locations, and no vintage pinball machines in sight—they obviously blew their entire budget just getting the rights to the IP. And, at about 20 minutes in length, it’s actually less than a third of the length of the original album. There’s not even much weirdness to be found. Sure, there’s a de rigueur ambiguous horror movie ending that saves you the trouble of having to spend money on a spectral special effect. And there’s the fact that the couple here buy their bananas in bag form (thanks to sharp-eyed YouTube commenter grilledcheese2084 for picking up on this and commenting “WTF, who buys bagged bananas?”) An even more subtle dollop of surrealism occurs after Ryan leaves the pub and races home to check on Lucy: if you look closely, you’ll notice that he’s driving on the left side of the road. This was probably accomplished by reversing the film in post, but however they did it, it adds a subtle note of unease that was desperately needed.

And, of course, Tommy‘s weirdest choice is to use none of the Who’s original music at all. A bold gambit, for sure, but one I can’t say I entirely agree with.

Still, despite those meager surrealist touches, the entire thing is a slapdash slap in the face to Who fans. Who can believe Pete Townshed and (who made such an impression as Franz Liszt) would have allowed their psychedelic phantasmagoria to be turned into what is little more than a YouTube short, a “Tommy” adaptation in name only? The pinballcentric material is inherently strange enough that it could have produced a really weird movie, in the right hands. Maybe Hollywood can do a proper reboot someday? I’m not sure who would be capable of helming such an effort;  the late would have been perfect. But as it stands, this Tommy is not only deaf, dumb and blind—but also lame.

Tommy recently came out in a 4K UHD edition from Shout! Factory—are these guys desperate enough to release anything?—despite the fact that you can watch it for free (split into two parts) on YouTube (see below). I seriously doubt that you’ll see anything different on that disc, but if you’re foolish enough to spend good money on it, be our guest!

WHAT THE CRITICS SAY:

“…doesn’t give a damn about the material he started with…”–Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times (contemporaneous)

 

AND THE WINNERS OF THE 15TH ANNUAL WEIRDCADEMY AWARDS ARE…

In just a few hours, the telecast of the Oscars (or, as we refer to them, the “Weirdcademy Awards for squares”) will begin. We are happy to steal the Academy’s thunder by announcing cinema’s weirdest winners of 2024 now.

In the category of “Weirdest Short Film,” the sentimental favorite edged out a strong field of competitors, and overcame some vocal dissenters, as earns a posthumous award for his final released work, the music video for his own composition “The Answers to the Questions.”

TS Poll - Loading poll ...

In the category of “Weirdest Scene,” the Weirdcademy Award goes to Megalopolis (in a nail-biter) for the scene where Jon Voight marvels at his boner (and some other crazy stuff happens afterwards).

TS Poll - Loading poll ...

In the category of “Weirdest Actress,” the Award goes to The Substance‘s for her portrayal of an actress of a certain age who accepts an obviously Faustian bargain to timeshare a career with a younger clone-ish version of herself and winds up with her face on Hollywood Boulevard. Should Moore take home the Oscar, as Michelle Yeoh did in 2023 and did in 2024, this will mark the third year in a row (and the fourth time ever) that the Academy and the Weirdcademy have shared the Actress award. This gives us pause.

TS Poll - Loading poll ...

In the category of “Weirdest Actor,” the award goes to for his performance as an Applejack salesman-turned-fur trapper-turned-beaver conspiracy frustrator in Hundreds of Beavers, and also for having the most names of any nominee.

TS Poll - Loading poll ...

And speaking of beavers, was there ever any doubt that underground sensation Hundreds of Beavers would win the Weirdcademy Award for “Weirdest Picture”?

TS Poll - Loading poll ...

Thanks to all voting members of the Weirdcademy, and see you again next year!

You can browse previous years’ winners here.

YOUR VOTE DETERMINES THE WINNER OF THE 15TH ANNUAL WEIRDCADEMY AWARDS

This year, The Substance (and , The Substance) mark the only overlap between the Weirdcademy Awards and Hollywood’s lipstick-on-a-pig hootenanny, the Most Conventional Movie Awards. This follows a trend dating back all the way to last year of Hollywood recognizing one and exactly one weird film for awards season. ‘s gonzo body horror had just enough satirical traction to get the Academy to overlook the fact that at the end a bizarre mashup of its two lead characters drenches a tux-and-gown wearing audience in blood, but besides that, weird movies got about as far with the Academy as they normally do: nowhere. couldn’t sell enough wineries buy a single nomination for Megalopolis, which has to be the best New York-set Roman epic ever made where Jon Voight marvels at his own erection.

Instead, we get to choose between two musicals (one an overblown bore and the other mired in scandal), another (yawn) musical biopic, and a three-and-a-half hour movie about a destitute Holocaust survivor who’s also an impotent morphine addict and a rape victim with a mute sister-in-law and a wheelchair-bound wife, but other than that is a pretty carefree guy. (It’s the brutalest).

The Oscars are a joke, and everyone knows it. But you, my friend, you aren’t content with the same-old same-old. You want weird in your movies. The Weirdcademy Awards are for you, the moviegoer whose friends roll their eyes and sigh loudly when you suggest movie night should feature a gory all-puppet movie about a recovering alcoholic forced to become a serial killer because aliens have implanted a bomb in his neck.

Although the editors of 366 Weird Movies select the nominees from the pool of available movies, the Awards themselves are a naked popularity contest, and do not necessarily reflect either the artistic merit or intrinsic weirdness of the films involved. The Weirdcademy Awards are tongue-in-cheek and for fun only. Ballot-stuffing is a frequent occurrence. Please, no wagering.

The Weirdcademy Awards are given to the Weirdest Movie, Actor, Actress and Scene of the previous year, as voted by the members of the Weirdcademy of Motion Picture Arts and Weirdness.

Who makes up the Weirdcademy? Membership is open to all readers of 366 Weird Movies. If you can figure out how to vote in the poll, you are qualified to join. You can not be turned down because of your age, sex, religious or political affiliation, pronouns, or whether you still use “X.” There is no requirement that you’ve have to actually see any of the movies listed before voting. You can vote for any or all categories.

You can only vote once—so choose carefully. We’ll keep voting open until March 1, so we can announce our results before the Academy Awards and steal their thunder.

Be sure to also vote for Weirdest Short Film of the Year. To watch all five nominees and to cast your vote, please click here.

Here is your ballot for the 2024 edition of the Weirdcademy
Continue reading YOUR VOTE DETERMINES THE WINNER OF THE 15TH ANNUAL WEIRDCADEMY AWARDS

VOTE FOR THE WEIRDEST SHORT FILM OF 2024

It’s time for the 2024 edition of the Weirdcademy Awards, the premier (only) awards contest exclusively focused on weird films, chosen by weird film fans. That means shorts as well as features. We’ve collected all five nominees for 2024′s Weirdest Short of the Year together in one place, for ease of voting. You can cast a vote for your favorite until March 1. Choose carefully, because you can only vote once. This year’s slate features party-hearty doppelgängers, cotton ball cookies, psychic pet science, an animated plague of mutations, and an eerie minimalist music video from an old friend.

You can watch all the nominees in full below before voting (shorts may contain adult language, dead pets, cartoon blood, and unsanitary cookie preparation):

“The Answers to the Questions” by

“Coreys” by

“Opulent Round Edible Object” by

“The Rainbow Bridge” by

“Uncanny Alley” by

TS Poll - Loading poll ...

ONLINE FILM CRITICS SOCIETY 28TH ANNUAL AWARDS (2024) (WITH OUR VOTES)

The Online Film Critics Society awards for 2024 are in the books. Sean Baker’s entertaining stripper-meets-Russian-oligarch’s-son dramedy Anora was the big winner (Best Picture, Best Actress, Best Original Screenplay). Movies from our weird movie coverage universe earned a handful of nominations this year. The Substance garnered an impressive six nominations and two wins ( for Best Director and for Best Supporting Actress), I Saw the TV Glow was nominated for Best Picture, A Different Man got a nomination for Sebastian Stan and a special technical award for makeup, and ‘s The People’s Joker was a surprise winner in the Best Feature Debut category. Shockingly, Hundreds of Beavers scored zero nominations, despite my votes and presumably votes from the dozen or so of my colleagues who universally lauded it.

As always, despite the occasional levity in my tone, I take my voting responsibility seriously. I do not put forward weird films at the expense of worthier mainstream candidates just because it’s “my thing.” Here is the list of this year’s winners, along with my choices and a touch of personal commentary. And I apologize that this year, due to personal circumstances, I missed an unusually high number of nominated movies. But I did get in all of the Best Picture nominees, with the exception of Nosferatu (which was not a serious contender for the top prize).

BEST PICTURE

Graphic courtesy Nadine Whitney

Winner: Anora

Also nominated (listed ranked in final order of votes): The Substance, The Brutalist, Challengers, Nickel Boys, Conclave, Dune: Part Two, Nosferatu, I Saw the TV Glow, Wicked

My vote: The Substance

Comments: Clearly a strong contender based on its second place finish and directorial win, The Substance is awards-caliber horror that does not skimp on the squick. The consensus ultimately settled on a more palatable choice with Anora (my personal fifth place pick).

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE

Winner: Flow

Also nominated (in alphabetical order): Inside Out 2, Memoir of a Snail, Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl, The Wild Robot

My vote: Inside Out 2

Comments: Confession: I did not see Flow, Memoir of a Snail, or the new Wallace & Gromit, so my vote here doesn’t count for much. Between Inside Out and Wild Robot (which both made my top 20 movies of the year), I picked the more secular-minded choice. Continue reading ONLINE FILM CRITICS SOCIETY 28TH ANNUAL AWARDS (2024) (WITH OUR VOTES)