For fifty years, Orson Welles’ Chimes at Midnight (1966) was locked in various disputes over ownership, and was only sporadically seen in wretched prints. It was talked and written about so much that inevitably seeing it (as I did in Chicago in the 90s) amounted to an ordeal. With both poor visual and audio, it was unquestionably a disappointment. Thankfully, Janus Films came to a long overdue rescue in 2015.

The restoration (available on the Criterion Collection) is miraculous, revealing one of Welles’ most astonishing, loving creations. While F for Fake was Welles’ final finished film, Chimes at Midnight is his final completed narrative feature—one that he never could have topped. The character of Falstaff inspired Welles to heights previously unreached (as it did Giuseppe Verdi). Chimes is his most personal and finest foray into Shakespearean terrain. While you’re watching it, you feel he’s peerless. Despite an epic struggle to finish the production, Welles’ direction is assured, but it’s as an actor that he soars in a tour de force performance. Welles himself cited as his best work, fulfilling a lifelong ambition to play Falstaff on film. One is inclined to agree. Welles had first played the part in a high school play that was ambitiously intended to be three hours long. Predictably, the school demanded cuts, forcing him to compromise (it wouldn’t be the last time). He played the part again in the late 1930s and in 1960, although both productions were short-lived financial failures.

Welles’ The Chimes at Midnight screenplay draws a linear chronological portrait of John Falstaff from the plays “Henry IV,” “Henry V,” “The Merry Wives of Windsor,” and “Richard III,” with Ralph Richardson’s narration taken from Raphael Holinshed’s “Chronicles.”

Like almost all of Welles’ later films, it was made under ragged conditions. The director was able to obtain meager financing by telling a bold faced lie (see F For Fake) to producer Emiliano Piedra, promising to direct and act in a version of “Treasure Island” in exchange. Welles had no intention of keeping that promise,  which Piedra eventually discovered, complicating the production (it took two years to complete). Despite budgetary struggles, Welles produced a final masterpiece. Only Welles could do so much with so little, crafting a chiaroscuro landscape with an epic ferociously bleak battle scene that can rank with the likes of Kurosawa.

Still from Chimes at Midnight (1965)With his girth and advanced age now a plus, Welles is physically perfect for the role, but the character of a lush, rogue anecdotist on the verge of become a train wreck parody is also close to the actor’s heart.  He doesn’t play Falstaff too broadly (comedy was never Welles’ medium), and there is a touch of smallness in the distended knight living beyond his means. Art imitating life, as far as Welles was concerned. Almost equally fine is ‘s performance as the draconian Henry and (most disturbingly) as the prostitute Doll Tearsheet.

As fine as Laurence Olivier was as Hamlet, Henry, and Richard, there was always a feeling of Shakespeare being too easy for him. The (considerably budgeted) productions went smoothly. One never comes away from Olivier’s Shakespeare with a sense of the artist and the production having grappled with the literary source.  Quintessentially professional, Olivier, like the Berlin Philharmonic conductor , is well-rehearsed in the art of reinterpretation. What makes Chimes at Midnight unique among the great cinematic Shakespeares is that which some critics initially complained of in it. Welles, like Leonard Bernstein, transforms interpretation into a sweaty brawl. In doing so, the director’s idiosyncrasies, or rather personality, is so imposed that it transforms  the work into a bona fide personal manifesto: lusty, often approaching a bacchanal.  It speaks volumes that Olivier, unlike Welles, was an Academy favorite. Yet Welles is as fearless and assured with the text as the more acclaimed examples of Olivier and Kenneth Branagh.

Put Chimes at Midnight at the top of your Shakespeare to do list. You won’t even have to wait a half century to see it as it should be seen.

One thought on “ORSON WELLES’ CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT (1966)”

  1. Great Pals at the workplace

    Do you discuss personal matters alongside with your co workers? It’s kind of hard not to. remain at a comfortable distance from your colleagues and enjoy spending all the eight hours in a day, Five six da good solidys that a week.

    Enjoy the company

    on the other hand, It takes much efforts to work cordially in a workplace where colleagues share hard With you. the workplace, Like any other place brings a bunch of people together. It is a jumble of many different personalities. In addition to the co workers who are easy to use, you’ll also find difficult people at work. What sets the workplace apart from many other places is that everyone even the difficult people must cooperate to productive. translates to well. She is friendly and chooses to share all her thoughts (Every last one specialists) up to you. She isn’t trying to cause harm to anyone and her incessant talking is just keeping you from working on your work. Here are some actions to quiet down your chattering co worker.

    in place of risk insulting your colleague, Put the blame on yourself. Tell your [spam link removed]asiame review co worker that you have trouble concentrating as long as you’re listening to her very engaging stories. If he/she’s not stressing about his/her health or family, They’re complaining about their job, The operation, or go with the boss. nevertheless, a few of their complaints may be legitimate, But the incessant whining is getting on negative feelings. usually, The complainer isn’t looking for advice so offering it probably won’t do any good. Not the ones who have a legitimate reason to delegate work to others, for example, executives or team leaders. We are speaking of those who either can’t do all the work they’ve been given or don’t want to do it. If team work is encouraged in your office as well as time to help your colleagues, actually should. extremely, Go ahead and choose pals at work carefully.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *