Comments on: 3. REPULSION (1965) http://366weirdmovies.com/repulsion-1965 Celebrating the cinematically surreal, bizarre, cult, oddball, fantastique, psychotronic, and the just plain WEIRD! Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:06:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Eric Gabbard http://366weirdmovies.com/repulsion-1965/comment-page-1#comment-169098 Eric Gabbard Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:44:15 +0000 http://366weirdmovies.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-169098 Polankski's "Apartment trilogy" is really something else. Repulsion and Rosemary's Baby are masterpieces without a doubt. I watched The Tenant for the first time last night and was amazed at how crazy it was. Admittedly, a slow first hour with some rather poor acting and pointless scenes, but the second hour really takes off (and I mean off)! Roman Polanski going nuts and performing most of his scenes in full drag...well, 'nuff said. Not on the level of the previous apartment films, but certainly all three are worthy of the List. Polankski’s “Apartment trilogy” is really something else. Repulsion and Rosemary’s Baby are masterpieces without a doubt. I watched The Tenant for the first time last night and was amazed at how crazy it was. Admittedly, a slow first hour with some rather poor acting and pointless scenes, but the second hour really takes off (and I mean off)! Roman Polanski going nuts and performing most of his scenes in full drag…well, ’nuff said. Not on the level of the previous apartment films, but certainly all three are worthy of the List.

]]> By: vm http://366weirdmovies.com/repulsion-1965/comment-page-1#comment-50437 vm Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:06:55 +0000 http://366weirdmovies.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-50437 "... a family photograph that lingers on the face and eyes of Carole as a young girl, sporting the same dead-eyed, distant stare as she does as a young woman..." Your observation is incorrect. Her "stare" in the photograph is accusatory. Look again - and see. “… a family photograph that lingers on the face and eyes of Carole as a young girl, sporting the same dead-eyed, distant stare as she does as a young woman…”

Your observation is incorrect. Her “stare” in the photograph is accusatory.
Look again – and see.

]]>