<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GUEST REVIEW: COMING SOON (2008)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://366weirdmovies.com/guest-review-coming-soon-2008/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://366weirdmovies.com/guest-review-coming-soon-2008</link>
	<description>Celebrating the cinematically surreal, bizarre, cult, oddball, fantastique, psychotronic, and the just plain WEIRD!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:53:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 366weirdmovies</title>
		<link>http://366weirdmovies.com/guest-review-coming-soon-2008/comment-page-1#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>366weirdmovies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://366weirdmovies.com/?p=1170#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the notice KV. Updating the main page with the purchase info is on my &quot;to do&quot; list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the notice KV. Updating the main page with the purchase info is on my &#8220;to do&#8221; list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KV</title>
		<link>http://366weirdmovies.com/guest-review-coming-soon-2008/comment-page-1#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>KV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://366weirdmovies.com/?p=1170#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>This film is now available in NTSC - both on DVD as well Internet downloads.

More info here: http://www.comingsoon.cz/php/en_novinkyahistorie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This film is now available in NTSC &#8211; both on DVD as well Internet downloads.</p>
<p>More info here: <a href="http://www.comingsoon.cz/php/en_novinkyahistorie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.comingsoon.cz/php/en_novinkyahistorie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr James D Smith</title>
		<link>http://366weirdmovies.com/guest-review-coming-soon-2008/comment-page-1#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr James D Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://366weirdmovies.com/?p=1170#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>EFA is for the Love of Animals.
Not the Rape (which they, the zoophile community, and I, claim is bestiality).

Minus the sense of pure sexual nature.

Zoophiles only have intimate relationships with their pets, because they love their non-human animal partners, and I&#039;m sure, the animals love them back :).

Bestialists beat/sedate their animal into sex, for the kick/pornography of deviancy.

Bestialists sometimes also beat their animals (are zoosadist), this figure is lower than domestic violence, by percentage, to human-based, intraspecific relationships.

Apparently, zoophilia is love; zoosexuality is sex; bestiality is zoosexual rape; and zoosadism is non-zoosexual and/or zoosexual cruelty / domestic violence.

The three communities may all have sex with animals, but not all have the same attributes.

Not all zoophiles (lovers of animals), are zoosexual (have sex with their animals).

Not all zoosexuals (those whom have sex with their animals), are bestialist (zoosexual rapists).

Not many zoosadists (animal sadists) are bestialists (zoosexual rapists).

In the dictionary, however, adds confusion...
&quot;Bestiality&quot; means &quot;Sexual activity between a person and an animal&quot; and/or &quot;Zooerasty&quot;.

But in the zoophile community...
&quot;Bestiality&quot; means &quot;Zoosexually-based rape&quot;, &quot;Sexual Abuse Of Animals, Where The Animal Is The Passive Partner; And Not Only, Perhaps, Not The Only &#039;Deviancy&#039;/&#039;Sexuality&#039; Of The &#039;Offender&#039;&quot;, &quot;Fence-Hopping&quot; and/or &quot;Not Loving The Animal Involved With Sex&quot;.

You can see how the zoophile community have twisted it.
However, some bestialists and deviants do make out to be zoophiles, but aren&#039;t.

All EFA is for, is the acceptance, awareness, and protection of zoophiles. Hence they are an organization for zoophile rights.

If you fall in love and lust with someone, sex is one of the intimacies. Sex is pleasure. However, deviants and bestialists force themselves onto (their) animals, affecting the animal&#039;s welfare and/or health. For example, harm, force and cruelty.

Whereas, pure sex is the love of pleasure.
The only time when sex on its own, isn&#039;t a pleasure, is knowing you could get pregnant (with someone you don&#039;t want), when/if you don&#039;t want to.

Otherwise, only force and cruelty is bad.
Zoosexuality is not.

And zoosexuality is more than often, zoophilia.

I speak, as a zoophilic zoosexual, and sexological researcher (PhD).

Regards,
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EFA is for the Love of Animals.<br />
Not the Rape (which they, the zoophile community, and I, claim is bestiality).</p>
<p>Minus the sense of pure sexual nature.</p>
<p>Zoophiles only have intimate relationships with their pets, because they love their non-human animal partners, and I&#8217;m sure, the animals love them back :).</p>
<p>Bestialists beat/sedate their animal into sex, for the kick/pornography of deviancy.</p>
<p>Bestialists sometimes also beat their animals (are zoosadist), this figure is lower than domestic violence, by percentage, to human-based, intraspecific relationships.</p>
<p>Apparently, zoophilia is love; zoosexuality is sex; bestiality is zoosexual rape; and zoosadism is non-zoosexual and/or zoosexual cruelty / domestic violence.</p>
<p>The three communities may all have sex with animals, but not all have the same attributes.</p>
<p>Not all zoophiles (lovers of animals), are zoosexual (have sex with their animals).</p>
<p>Not all zoosexuals (those whom have sex with their animals), are bestialist (zoosexual rapists).</p>
<p>Not many zoosadists (animal sadists) are bestialists (zoosexual rapists).</p>
<p>In the dictionary, however, adds confusion&#8230;<br />
&#8220;Bestiality&#8221; means &#8220;Sexual activity between a person and an animal&#8221; and/or &#8220;Zooerasty&#8221;.</p>
<p>But in the zoophile community&#8230;<br />
&#8220;Bestiality&#8221; means &#8220;Zoosexually-based rape&#8221;, &#8220;Sexual Abuse Of Animals, Where The Animal Is The Passive Partner; And Not Only, Perhaps, Not The Only &#8216;Deviancy&#8217;/'Sexuality&#8217; Of The &#8216;Offender&#8217;&#8221;, &#8220;Fence-Hopping&#8221; and/or &#8220;Not Loving The Animal Involved With Sex&#8221;.</p>
<p>You can see how the zoophile community have twisted it.<br />
However, some bestialists and deviants do make out to be zoophiles, but aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>All EFA is for, is the acceptance, awareness, and protection of zoophiles. Hence they are an organization for zoophile rights.</p>
<p>If you fall in love and lust with someone, sex is one of the intimacies. Sex is pleasure. However, deviants and bestialists force themselves onto (their) animals, affecting the animal&#8217;s welfare and/or health. For example, harm, force and cruelty.</p>
<p>Whereas, pure sex is the love of pleasure.<br />
The only time when sex on its own, isn&#8217;t a pleasure, is knowing you could get pregnant (with someone you don&#8217;t want), when/if you don&#8217;t want to.</p>
<p>Otherwise, only force and cruelty is bad.<br />
Zoosexuality is not.</p>
<p>And zoosexuality is more than often, zoophilia.</p>
<p>I speak, as a zoophilic zoosexual, and sexological researcher (PhD).</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Milton</title>
		<link>http://366weirdmovies.com/guest-review-coming-soon-2008/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Milton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://366weirdmovies.com/?p=1170#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Beautiful review Mr. Eaker, but I don&#039;t think this film supports abuse of animals. I am E.F.A. member and I know ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful review Mr. Eaker, but I don&#8217;t think this film supports abuse of animals. I am E.F.A. member and I know ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 366weirdmovies</title>
		<link>http://366weirdmovies.com/guest-review-coming-soon-2008/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>366weirdmovies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://366weirdmovies.com/?p=1170#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review, Alfred.  I&#039;m likely to give &lt;em&gt;Coming Soon&lt;/em&gt; a shot on the final list of 366, but I&#039;m waiting for a NTSC DVD release.  Devilshead films has said that they have one planned, but there are no details on when it might arrive.  The film has been promoted and screened throughout Europe, but is almost unknown here in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review, Alfred.  I&#8217;m likely to give <em>Coming Soon</em> a shot on the final list of 366, but I&#8217;m waiting for a NTSC DVD release.  Devilshead films has said that they have one planned, but there are no details on when it might arrive.  The film has been promoted and screened throughout Europe, but is almost unknown here in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

